The Uncomfortable Truth About SDS Quality
The message rarely arrives at a convenient time.
A customer has paused a shipment until they receive an updated Safety Data Sheet. A distributor wants confirmation that your label and SDS align before they will list the product. A tender asks for hazard communication evidence by close of play, and the commercial team is watching the clock. In Europe, a Poison Centre Notification (PCN) question lands with an added edge, because the consequences of getting it wrong can include disrupted market access and regulatory scrutiny.
This is the moment that defines trust. Not because the request is unusual, but because urgency exposes whether your organisation can respond with confidence, consistency, and care.
The Real Operational Risk Behind Document Compliance
If SDS management feels like a constant chase, you are not imagining it. Regulators continue to find significant non-compliance across the market. The ECHA Forum’s REF-11 enforcement project reports a non-compliance level around the mid-30% range for SDS requirements, even after years of industry effort.
And the problem is not only “missing paperwork”. It is coherence, accuracy, and defensibility across documents and decisions. Yordas’ own audit work has shown how frequently reclassification is required when SDS are reviewed at scale, with nearly 30% of reviewed SDS requiring reclassification in one audit of over 6,000 documents.
In other words, the operational risk is real. But the commercial risk is often underestimated: slow or uncertain responses create friction in sales, delays in distribution, and unnecessary escalation across customers and supply chains.
Why “Fast Access” Is Not The Same As “Fast Resolution”
Most SDS platforms in the market lead with a familiar promise: centralised access, universal availability, and speed. That matters, but it is not the full problem.
Because urgent requests are rarely just about locating a PDF. They are about resolving ambiguity:
Which version is “the right one” for this market and this customer, today?
Does the hazard classification still hold after recent regulatory change?
Are the label and SDS consistent, and can you demonstrate it?
For PCN, do you have the additional information that an SDS alone rarely contains?
The market tends to over-index on retrieval. The real value is decision-ready clarity, delivered quickly, with accountable expertise behind it.
Introducing The Regulatory Response As Your Entry Point
At Yordas, we treat the urgent SDS or PCN request as an entry point into something bigger: a regulatory response model that flexes to your immediate, mid-term, and long-term needs.
Not a one-off firefight. Not a hand-off into a faceless ticket queue. A structured engagement that helps you respond now, reclaim control, and strengthen future readiness
Here is the model:
Respond (immediate) - Triage the request, confirm the applicable markets and obligations, and deliver a clear, defensible answer with the right documentation. This is where empathy matters. Urgent regulatory challenges are rarely “just compliance”, they are usually tied to a shipment, a customer commitment, or a commercial deadline.
Reclaim (mid-term) - Identify what caused the urgency. Gaps in source data, inconsistent classification logic, misalignment between SDS and labels, or unclear ownership across functions. This is where we reduce repeat incidents and build confidence in the process, not just the document.
Reinforce (long-term) - Put lifecycle management in place so your hazard communications stay current, visible, and governed, without relying on heroics. This is where regulatory response becomes a durable capability.
PCN Is Where Urgency Becomes Complexity, Fast
PCN obligations are a practical example of why response needs both system clarity and expert certainty. PCN readiness is often limited by factors outside the SDS itself: supply chain information gaps, the quality and completeness of toxicological data, the timing of UFI generation, and even submission mechanics that can delay “completion” in certain Member States.
This is precisely where an empathetic, people-first service matters. Not because it is softer, but because it is more effective. When the clock is running, you need a team that can interpret, challenge, and complete the picture, and a system that makes the work transparent.
Where Helix SDSM Turns Pressure Into Control
A people-first promise only works if it is backed by operational transparency. That is why we connect the regulatory response model to the Helix SDS Manager (SDSM), designed to centralise your SDS library and support ongoing lifecycle management across supplier and product SDS.
In practical terms, Helix SDSM helps you:
Index SDS content through an intuitive upload process, connecting key data to a substance database for faster interpretation and downstream use.
Organise and govern your SDS inventory with sharing, tracking, and customisable tagging across teams.
Manage change with precision by toggling alerts on or off per SDS and seeing which substances have been affected by regulatory updates.
Escalate to experts when it matters, linking directly to hazard communication support for authoring, classification assessments, and labelling.
This combination changes the nature of “urgent”. Instead of scrambling to find the latest document and justify it after the fact, you can answer with confidence because the underlying evidence and ownership are visible.
Automation Helps, But It Does Not Remove The Need For Judgment
It is tempting to believe the answer is purely technical: automate more, generate faster, scale infinitely.
But hazard communication lives in the real world of country-to-country variation, evolving GHS implementation, and market-specific requirements that still demand interpretation. Yordas’ own work on SDS authoring systems is explicit on this point: even under the umbrella of GHS, variation persists and maintaining compliant outputs across markets remains a challenge that requires informed control, not just throughput.
A midern regulatory response is not anti-automation. It is pro-accountability. Technology should make the work transparent and repeatable, while experts assure that your decisions are correct, defensible, and commercially safe.
What “people-first” looks like when the stakes are real
People-first is not a slogan. It is a service posture:
We start with the pressure you are under, and we make the next step clear.
We give you visibility, not just outputs.
We reduce the chance of recurrence, not just the pain of today.
We stay close enough to your business to respond quickly, but structured enough to stay consistent.
This is how a regulatory response becomes the foundation of an ongoing client relationship: one built on reliability, clarity, and shared confidence.
Speak To An Expert
If you are facing an urgent SDS request, a PCN question, or a broader hazard communication challenge, speak to a Yordas hazard communication expert. We will help you respond quickly, reclaim control of the underlying issues, and reinforce long-term lifecycle management through Helix SDSM.
Further reading
